next up previous contents
Next: 3D implementation Up: Stresses prescribed Previous: Stresses prescribed

2D implementation

  In 2D stresses prescribed implies that normal and tangential stress components at the boundary are prescribed. Let and be the normal resp. tangential physical stress at the boundary, where the normal and tangential vector are defined as in 5.1.1.
From and we can compute and by

  

where is defined by

 

An important remark is that in this formulation pressure and deviatoric stress tensor can not be separated, hence the discretization of both must be the same at the boundary. For that reason the discretization of the pressure at the boundary will be different from the one in the inner region.
Since no velocities are prescribed, it is necessary to consider finite volume cells around each velocity unknown, including the ''normal'' velocity points at the boundary.
Let us first consider the ''tangential'' boundary cell as sketched in Figure 7.1. The discretization of the convective terms, the right-hand side and the time derivative are exactly the same as for the inner cells, with the exception that virtual (tangential) velocities are eliminated by linear extrapolation as in formula (7.4).
The stress tensor (deviatoric part and pressure together) is discretized by:

 

In this expression is given by formula (7.4). All other terms are treated in the usual way (except of course for the pressure).
With respect to the normal velocity unknown at the boundary a half cell is defined as in Figure 7.3.

  
Figure 7.3: A ''normal'' velocity half cell at the boundary

The discretization of the convective terms plus the stress tensor at the boundary is given by formula (6.14) from Van Kan et al. (1991):

 

where

 

The discretization of the right-hand side gives

 

and of the time-derivative:

 

The discretization of the convective terms is derived from (7.13) by substitution of

 

and the approximation

 

The discretization of the stress tensor at the boundary is given by formulae (6.14), (6.15) of Van Kan et al. (1991):

 

where RHS is defined by

 

The evaluation of introduces extra difficulties.
Following Van Kan et al. (1991), page 76, we use instead of .
Furthermore is computed at the preceding time-level, and replaced by . Virtual velocities are not used. To compute at the preceding time level, at the boundary is computed by linear extrapolation from inside, using two points.


Tatiana Tijanova
Wed Mar 26 10:36:42 MET 1997